SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1928 Supreme(Nagpur) 110

FINDLAY
ABAS ALI – Appellant
Versus
KODHUSAO – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Findlay, J C—The question referred for the consideration of this Full Beach is as follows:

If A agrees to sell a property to B and earnest money or an advance payment of part of the purchase-money is paid to A, and if B subsequently commits a breach of the contract is B entitled to recover from A, the advance payment or earnest money in question?

2. It will be convenient to consider first the question of earnest money simpliciter, leaving out of account the item of an advance payment of part of the purchase money, regarding which it is possible that different legal incidents might arise.

3. This particular matter was considered at great length by Batten and Stanyon, A.J. Cs., in Ballabhdas v-Paikaji (3). It is unnecessary to repeat at length the reasoning of the learned Additional Judicial Commissioners in that judgment. It will suffice to say that the Additional Judicial Commissioners were of opinion that such earnest money or a part payment in advance of the purchase-money made under a stipulation that it shall be forfeited if the purchaser makes default is governed by Section 74, Contract Act, and gives the Courts discretion to deal withthe forfeiture on equitable principle










Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top