SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1955 Supreme(Nagpur) 53

MUDHOLKAR, NAIK
GANGABAI WIDOW OF GUHAN TELI – Appellant
Versus
PUNAU RAJWA TELI – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
D T Mangalmurti, M R Bobde, R K Verma, R P Verma, Advocates

JUDGMENT

1. This is a Defendant's appeal from a decree confirming the possession of the Plaintiff over a 3 anna share in mauza Chingrod and certain sir and khudkasht lands situate therein.

2. It is common ground that Guhan, the deceased husband of the Defendant-Appellant, and Punau, the Plaintiff-Respondent, were brothers, born of different mothers, and held jointly an 3 anna share in mauza Chingrod with sir and klusdkasht lands in that share. In addition, they also joint owners of 50 acres of occupancy land in mauza Lafin Khurd.

Before Guhan's death, the land and certain house property at Lafin was partitioned by metes and bounds and was in the separate possession of Guhan and Punau. After his death, the village share owned by the two brothers in mauza Chingrod was actually partitioned and mutated separately in the names of the Appellant and Punau. That was on 24-1-1945.

3. According to the Respondent, on 4-5-1945, a document style 1 as family arrangement was signed by the Appellant, the Respondent, the Appellant's daughter Pilibai and her husband Rambhamosa as guardian of their minor son Gendram and by Maktula, the mother of Punau.

Under this document, 1-anna share together with propo



































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top