MUDHOLKAR, NAIK
GANGABAI WIDOW OF GUHAN TELI – Appellant
Versus
PUNAU RAJWA TELI – Respondent
1. This is a Defendant's appeal from a decree confirming the possession of the Plaintiff over a 3 anna share in mauza Chingrod and certain sir and khudkasht lands situate therein.
2. It is common ground that Guhan, the deceased husband of the Defendant-Appellant, and Punau, the Plaintiff-Respondent, were brothers, born of different mothers, and held jointly an 3 anna share in mauza Chingrod with sir and klusdkasht lands in that share. In addition, they also joint owners of 50 acres of occupancy land in mauza Lafin Khurd.
Before Guhan's death, the land and certain house property at Lafin was partitioned by metes and bounds and was in the separate possession of Guhan and Punau. After his death, the village share owned by the two brothers in mauza Chingrod was actually partitioned and mutated separately in the names of the Appellant and Punau. That was on 24-1-1945.
3. According to the Respondent, on 4-5-1945, a document style 1 as family arrangement was signed by the Appellant, the Respondent, the Appellant's daughter Pilibai and her husband Rambhamosa as guardian of their minor son Gendram and by Maktula, the mother of Punau.
Under this document, 1-anna share together with propo
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.