SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1952 Supreme(Nagpur) 38

V R.SEN
GOVINDA SAKHARAM – Appellant
Versus
HARIBHAU SITARAM – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
D R Baxy, G B Shidhaye, Advocates

JUDGMENT

V R Sen, J—This is an application by the Plaintiff Govinda for modification of the judgment and decree of the Court of the 2nd Civil Judge, Class II, Nagpur empowered under Section 18, C.P. Courts Act.

2. The Plaintiff has filed a suit for recovery of 3 khandis' and 9 kudoes' of juar. In default of delivery of grain, he asked for a decree for Rs. 250/-. His case is that he works as a carpenter in Ajni where the Defendant Haribhau has land. The Defendant had employed the services of the Plaintiff as a carpenter for his cultivation for the last 8 years. The Defendant was to pay to the Plaintiff one 'khandi' of juar each year for the repairs done to the agricultural implements by the Plaintiff. If any new work was to be done, the Defendant was to give extra juar. The juar had to be paid on the 'mandwas' of each year. He did work for the Defendant in 1946-47, 1947-48, 1948-49 and 1949-50 and was entitled to 4 khandis' of juar for his work. For new work, he claimed 9 kudoes' of juar. The price of juar was Rs. 72/- per 'khandi'.

3. The Defendant resisted the claim on several grounds. He admitted that the Plaintiff was a carpenter and had done work for him. The Plaintiff was to rece









Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top