HIDAYATULLAH, MANGALMURTI, MUDHOLKAR
LAXMIBAI W/O RADHAKISAN – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH – Respondent
Hidayatullah, J—This is a petition purporting to be under Article 226 of the Constitution for a. writ of certiorari or mandamus or for directions & orders against the four non-applicants. The-facts on which the petitioner seeks redress are-stated briefly as follows:
2. The petitioner owns a house No. 294 B in Ward No. 9 Akola, district Akola,. Non-applicant 4 Kewalchand is occupying a portion of the house as a tenant. The rent which was agreed upon between the parties was Rs. 100 per month.
3. Non-applicant 4 applied to the Rent Controller. Akola (Non-applicant 3) on 15-1-1948 under the House Rent Control Order for the fixation of a fair rent for the portion of the house-in his occupation. The Rent Controller by his order passed on 22-8-1949 held that the fair rent for the premises should be Rs. 78 per month: vide Revenue Case No. 244/86 of 1947-48 of Akola.
4. Against this order an appeal was taken to the Deputy Commissioner, Akola (Non- applicant 2), who further reduced the rent to Rs. 40 per month. The order of the Deputy Commissioner was passed on 30-6-1950--vide Revenue Application No. 15/86 of 1949-50. The order of the Deputy Commissioner was communicated to the petition
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.