J SEN
WAMANRAO – Appellant
Versus
RAMCHANDRA MAROTRAO – Respondent
J Sen, J—This appeal arises out of an execution case. The appellant Waman Nanaji Patil obtained a decree on 19-3-1934 in Civil Suit No. 60 of 1932 against the respondent Ramchandra 'alias' Chandrabhan son of Marotrao Patil for Rs. 14,954-6-0 and Rs. 1,108/- as costs. The decree-holder made an application on 11-2-1942 for execution of the decree for Rs. 14,953-12-0 and asked that the leasehold rights of the judgment-debtor under the lease dated 25-8-1915 be attached and sold.
2. Subsequent to the filing of the execution application, the decree-holder filed a list of the fields which the judgment-debtor had obtained on lease in perpetuity under the lease dated 25-8-1915 executed by Gulabrao Narayanrao Patil in his favour. Afterwards, the decree-holder filed a certified copy of the lease on 6-3-1942. On that date the executing Court directed the issue of a prohibitory order under Order XXI, Rule 54, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, prohibiting the judgment-debtor from transferring or charging his leasehold rights in any way. The prohibitory order was served on the judgment-debtor on 7-5-1942.
3. On the objection (Miscellaneous Case No. 19 of 1942) made by Bhasker on 18-9-1942 unde
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.