SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1947 Supreme(Nagpur) 14

MANOHAR VINAYAK – Appellant
Versus
LAXMAN ANANDRAO DESHMUKH – Respondent


JUDGMENT

1. This is a Letters Patent appeal against the decision of Bose J., dismissing Second Appeal No. 101 of 1940 on 7-10-1943. The preliminary objection of the respondents against the competency of Civil Appeal No. 20A of 1939 on the ground of res judicata resulted in the dismissal of that appeal by the lower appellate Court and the dismissal was upheld in second appeal. In order to comprehend the exact nature and effect of the respondents' objection it is necessary to state a few facts chronologically.

2. The genealogical table of the appellants family is as below: AMBADAS

______________________|_____________________ | | Vinayak Pralhad (now dead) |____________________________________________| | | | Manohar (Deft. 1) Wasudeo (Deft. 2) Krishnarao (Deft. 3) _________________________________|___________________________________ | | | | | | | Ramchandra Laxman Vishwanath Rajeshwar Vishnu Digambar Devidas (Deft. 4) (Deft. 5) (Deft. 6) (Deft. 7) (Deft. 8) (Deft. 9) (Deft. 10).

3. The present respondents 1 to 3 were plaintiffs in civil Suit NO. l of 1928 instituted against Manohar, Wasudeo and their uncle Pralhad (now deceased). A money decree was passed against three defendants on 28-2







































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top