Back
S.J.MUKHOPADHAYA, BANSI LAL BHAT
Darshak Enterprise Pvt. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Chhaparia Industries Pvt. Ltd. – Respondent
ORDER :
Both the appeals have been preferred by the appellant(s) (‘Operational Creditor’) against the order dated 29th September, 2017 passed by the Adjudicating Authority (National Company Law Tribunal), Mumbai Bench in M.A. No. 349/2017 in C.P. No. 23/I&BP/NCLT/MB/MAH/2017 whereby and whereunder the Adjudicating Authority approved the ‘Resolution Plan’ with the following observations:
9. Accordingly, MA No. 349/2017 is hereby allowed by vacating the moratorium already granted at the time of the admission of the Company Petition 23/2017 and extension given on 23.8.2017.
10. In view of the approval given to the Resolution Plan filed by the Insolvency Resolution Professional, this Bench hereby discharges the Insolvency Resolution P
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
