1922 Supreme(Lah) 133
Lahore High Court
Zafar Ali, J.
Bhedu & Ors. - Appellants
Versus
The Crown - Respondent
Decided On : 08-12-1922
JUDGMENT
1. The order under Section 133 Cr. Pro. Code is not based upon any evidence. Therefore I set it aside.
Lahore High Court
Zafar Ali, J.
Bhedu & Ors. - Appellants
Versus
The Crown - Respondent
Decided On : 08-12-1922
JUDGMENT
1. The order under Section 133 Cr. Pro. Code is not based upon any evidence. Therefore I set it aside.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!