SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1927 Supreme(Lah) 76

JAI LAL
Ruchi Ram Khattar – Appellant
Versus
Sarah Narain, Shah – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Jai Lal, J. - This is an application under Sections 22, 23 and 151, Civil P.C., made by the defendant Ruchi Ram Khattar for the transfer of the civil suit for the recovery of Rs. 1,08,974-8-3, instituted in the Court of the Subordinate Judge of Rawalpindi, to the Dera Ismail Khan District in the North-Western Province. The suit is based on a promissory note admittedly executed by the petitioner in favour of one Sundar Das. Sundar Das, it is alleged, endorsed the promissory note in favour of Sarab Narain Shah, plaintiff. The promissory note was admittedly executed in Dera Ismail Khan, where the petitioner resides, but it is alleged that Sundar Das, who also is a defendant in the suit and is a resident of Rawalpindi, endorsed to Sarab Narain Shah in Rawalpindi. Sarab Narain Shah himself is a resident of the Jhelutn District. He does not carry on any business in Dera Ismail Khan.

2. The application for transfer is made on the ground that there was a dispute between Ruchi Ram and Sundar Das with regard to certain contracts alleged to have been jointly taken by them, which was referred to arbitration. The award of the arbitrator was that Sundar Das should pay Rs. 1,25,000 to Ruch

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top