JUDGMENT

Addison, J. - The plaintiff brought his suit against the Municipal Committee, Hansi, for a mandatory injunction to issue upon the defendant to rebuild a khal at a certain place at their own expense and for a perpetual injunction to restrain the defendant from building a drain on the site in question as it belonged to the plaintiff.

2. The trial Court held that the site belonged to the plaintiff, that the khal was illegally demolished by the President of the Committee, that the suit for a mandatory injunction could not proceed under Section 49, Municipal Act, and Section 54, Specific Relief Act, but that the suit for a perpetual injunction to restrain the defendant from interfering with and building a drain upon the site was competent. It accordingly gave a decree for the issue of the perpetual injunction described. Against this decision there were two appeals to the Senior Subordinate Judge and he dismissed them both. Against this decision the Municipal Committee has preferred this second appeal.

3. The one point argued was that, seeing that a portion of the relief was barred by reason of Section 49, Punjab Municipal Act and Section 54, Specific Relief Act, the whole suit was