SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1941 Supreme(Lah) 122

BECKETT
Nizam Khan – Appellant
Versus
Hukam Chand, Creditor – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Beckett, J. - The facts which give rise to the present petition for revision are as follows: Mehndi Khan, the principal respondent, was adjudicated an insolvent on 7th October 1936. This was done on a creditor's petition, alleging that Mehndi Khan had committed an act of insolvency by alienating an important portion of his property on 7th June 1935, a few days before the petition was presented. The application for adjudication was not opposed. The insolvent was directed to apply for discharge within one year. On 12th January 1937 the Official Receiver sought to carry out the main object of the proceedings by means of an application, in which it was asserted that the alienation in question amounted to a fraudulent preference of the creditors in whose favour it had been made, and the Court was requested to annul the transfer under Section 54, Provincial Insolvency Act, 1920. After this application had been put in, it appears that some of the creditors represented to the receiver that the transferees were not in fact creditors of the insolvent, but had been falsely shown as such for the purpose of giving a colourable appearance to the transaction, which was in reality a volunt

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top