SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1944 Supreme(Lah) 91

HARRIES
Homi Rustomji Pardivala – Appellant
Versus
Sub-Inspector Baig – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Harries, C J - The respondents Mirza Asdaq Baig, Mr. William Douglas Robinson and Mr. Ernest William Cornish Wace have appeared in this Court in answer to a notice show cause why they should not be connected and punished for contempt of Court, appreciate the points involved, it will be necessary to set out the facts giving rise to lese proceedings in some detail. On 25th October 1943, Mr. Homi Rustomji Pardivala, Barrister-at-Law and an Advocate practising a the original side of the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, was instructed by a firm of Solicitors, Messrs Kanga and Company Bombay, to proceed to Lahore and to is truct and appear with Mr. Jiwan Lal Kapur, a Barrister practising in this Court on behalf of Mrs. Purnima Bannerji of Allahabad, ho was proposing to file a petition under: 491, Criminal P.C, relating to one Jai 'arkash Narain who was being detained in his Province under Rule 26, Defence of India Jules. In pursuance of the instructions received from the Solicitors, Mr. Pardivala rived at Lahore on 5th November 1948 and immediately got into touch with Mr. Jiwan jal Kapur whom he instructed to file an application under Section 491, Criminal P.C. This applicatio

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top