SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1941 Supreme(FC) 3

MAURICE GWYER
In Re: Hindu Womens Rights to Property Act, 1937 – Appellant
Versus
. – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Gwyer, C.J. - This is a special reference which His Excellency the Governor-General has been pleased to make to the Court Under Section 213, Constitution Act. The questions referred are:

(1) Does either the Hindu Women's Rights to Property Act, 1937(Central Act, 18 of 1937), which was passed by the Legislative Assembly on 4th February 1937, and by the Council of State on 6th April 1937, and which received the Governor-General's assent on 14th April 1937, or the Hindu Women's Rights to Property (Amendment) Act, 1938(Central Act, 11 of 1938), which was passed In all its stages after 1st April 1937, operate to regulate (a) succession to agricultural land? (b) devolution by survivorship of property other than agricultural land?

(2) Is the subject of devolution by survivorship of property other than agricultural land included in any of the entries in the three Legislative Lists in Schedule 7, Government of India Act, 1935?

2. There being no "opposite party" properly so called to this reference, it was not considered necessary or useful to serve any parties with notice of the reference. But as the Court desired to hear the various possible viewpoints presented and argued, it suggest

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top