SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1943 Supreme(FC) 4

ZAFRULLA KHAN
Emperor – Appellant
Versus
Sibnath Banerjee – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Zafrulla Khan, J. - (Varadachariar J. concurring.) (Cases Nos. 13 to 21 of 194,3), These appeals have been preferred by the Bengal Government against orders passed by the Calcutta High Court directing the release of nine persons who were being detained Under Rule 26, Defence of India Rules. The detention orders had been passed on various dates in the years 1940 and 1942. By a judgment given on 22nd April of this year, See Keshav Talpade v. Emperor ('43) 30 A.I.R. 1943 F.C. 1 this Court held Rule 26, Defence of India Rules to be ultra vires in that it went beyond the rule-making power conferred on the Central Government by the Defence of India Act. Immediately after this judgment was pronounced, the applications, out of which these appeals have arisen, were filed Under Section 491, Criminal P.C., praying for the release of the detenus concerned on the ground that their detention was illegal. On 28th April, the Governor-General promulgated an Ordinance, 14 of 1943, whereby the rule-making power of the Central Government under the Defence of India Act was made wider so as to cover the terms of Rule 26 as it had all along stood. The section was so worded as to make this change

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top