SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1930 Supreme(Rang) 116

Ma Paw – Appellant
Versus
Emperor – Respondent


JUDGMENT

1. In this case the petitioner, Ma Paw, laid an information at the Ngazun Police Station, Sagaing District, charging Ba Hein and Ba Si with robbery. The police investigated the case, found it to be false and threw it out, whereupon she filed a complaint in the Court of the Special Power Magistrate, Sagaing, making the same allegations. The Magistrate examined her on oath and sent the papers to the police for inquiry and report under Section 202, Criminal P.C. In the meantime the police laid a complaint against her under Section 182, I.P.C., in the Court of the Additional Magistrate, Ngazun. Later, on receipt of the police report, the Special Power Magistrate threw out the complaint of the petitioner under Section 203, Criminal P.C.; he however omitted to pass any order as regards classification. On the complaint made by the police the petitioner was found guilty and sentenced to pay a fine of Rs. 100 or, in default to suffer 1 1/2 months' rigorous imprisonment. She appealed, but her appeal was dismissed by the District Magistrate of Sagaing. She now seeks the interference of this Court in revision on the ground that where information to the police amounting to a false charg

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top