Back
ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
X, J
Aditya Rotor Spin (P) Ltd. Kanpur and Another v. U. P. State Electricity Board Lucknow and Another
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioners seek restoration of electric supply. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. previous writ petition addressed electric supply issues. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. arguments against disconnection without notice. (Para 6 , 8) |
| 4. regulation 22 allows disconnection without notice for theft. (Para 9 , 10 , 11) |
| 5. agreement terms do not conflict with regulations. (Para 13 , 14 , 15) |
| 6. guidelines under regulation 22 are not arbitrary. (Para 16 , 17) |
| 7. requirement to pay assessment bill for disconnection. (Para 18 , 19) |
| 8. court orders regarding assessment bill and hearing. (Para 21 , 22) |
| 9. writ petition dismissed due to lack of merit. (Para 24 , 26) |
1. The petitioners have filed the present writ petition for a writ of mandamus commanding the respondents to restore the supply of electrical energy to the petitioner company and for declaring Regulation 22 of the Electricity Supply (Consumers) Regulations, 1984, as ultra vires. During the course of hearing of the writ petition the petitioners also moved an amendment application, which was allowed, for quashing the assessment demand notice dated 18-12-1990 (Annexure 9 to the writ petition).
2. Petitioner No. 1 is a private limited company which has a facto
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
