SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(All) 787

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
Dinesh Kumar Sharma – Appellant
Versus
State of U.P. and 4 others – Respondent


HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD Dinesh Kumar Sharma …..Revisionist(s)

Versus State of U.P. and 4 others …..Opposite Party(s)

Counsel for Revisionist(s) : In Person, Vikas Srivastava Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A.

Reserved on 26.02.2026 Delivered on 19.03.2026 In Chambers HON'BLE GARIMA PRASHAD, J.

1. Heard Sri Vikas Srivastava, learned counsel appearing for the revisionist and the learned AGA appearing for the State.

2. The present criminal revision assails the ex parte order dated 01.03.2023 passed by the learned Civil Judge (Junior Division), Fast Track Court, whereby the application filed under Section 23 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 was allowed and the revisionist was directed to pay a sum of Rs.4,000/- per month to his wife, opposite party No.2, as interim maintenance from the date of the order. The revisionist further challenges the judgment and order dated 03.10.2023 whereby the recall application preferred by the revisionist against the ex parte order was rejected, as well as the order dated 16.07.2025 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge dismissing Criminal Appeal No. 207 of 2023 preferred by the revisionist.

3. The brief fa

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top