SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2004 Supreme(Online)(AP) 16

ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT
C. V. Ramulu, J
SK. Sujatha v. Government of A. P. and Another


1.The Writ Petition is filed challenging the notice - dated 28-8-2003 issued by the Revenue Divisional officer, Peddapalli to the petitioner who is the elected President of Mandal Parishad, Sreerampur Mandal, Karimnagar district, intimating her that the meeting of the Mandal Parishad will be convened on 15-9-2003 at 11.00 a.m. for considering the motion of no confidence moved against her.

2. At the time of hearing before the learned single Judge, learned counsel for the petitioner placed reliance upon the Judgment of this Court in W. A. Nos. 1755 and 1579 of 2003 (B. Ananda Reddy v. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Jagtial) dated 16-10-2003 wherein, interpreting R.3 of the Rules relating to Motion of No - Confidence in Upa - Sarpanch of Gram Panchayat or Vice - President / President of Mandal Parishad or Vice - Chairman / Chairman of Zilla Parishad as notified in G. O. Ms. No. 200 P.R. and R. D. (Mandal - I) (hereinafter referred to as 'the Rules") dated 28-4-1998, it was held that service of notice of fifteen days clear notice as contemplated in R.3 of the Rules is mandatory and insufficiency of the notice in Form No V annexed to the Rules shall make the meeting and the proceedings







































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top