SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2014 Supreme(Online)(AP) 14

ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT
*Kalyan Jyoti Sengupta, C. J., K. C. Bhanu, J.
Krishnaiah P. V. v. Union of India


Table of Content
1. challenges to art.3's validity related to state bifurcation. (Para 1 , 2)
2. court's stance on the separation of powers. (Para 4 , 9)
3. basic structure doctrine established. (Para 5 , 7)
4. parliament's powers under art.3 cannot be judicially restrained. (Para 8 , 10 , 12 , 18)
5. final disposition of the public interest litigation. (Para 14 , 15 , 16 , 20)

1. This public interest litigation has been filed for the following reliefs:
"...this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus or otherwise declaring (1) that Art.3 of the Constitution of India is violating the basic structure and preamble of the Constitution of India apart from inconsistent with other provisions of the Constitution of India, particularly Part 3 of the Constitution of India and quash and set aside the same or alternatively declare the Constitutional (V Amendment) Act, 1955 insofar as it relates to not ascertaining the views from the State Legislature pertaining to provisions proposed in the draft bill sent to the State Assembly in pursuance of recommendation made by the President as well as prescribing time to express views pertaining to proposed b







































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top