SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(AP) 12497

HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD
PAVAN GRANITE METAL WORKS – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF AP – Respondent


THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD WRIT PETITION NOs.9865, 17100 AND 17548 OF 2025 The Court made the following COMMON ORDER:

Heard Sri V. Sai Kumar, learned Counsel for the Writ Petitioners in W.P.No.17100 of 2025 and Sri Dheera Kanishka, learned Counsel for the Writ Petitioners in W.P.No.17548 of 2025, Smt. S. Pranathi, learned Standing Counsel for CRDA, Sri M. Srinu Babu, learned Assistant Government Pleader for MAUD, Sri G. Venkat Sailendra, learned Counsel appearing on behalf of Sri Gudapati Venkateswara Rao, learned Counsel for the Respondent No.6 in for Unofficial Respondent in all the Writ Petitions and Sri G. Ramakrishna, learned Government Pleader for Mines.

2. These Writ Petitions are having common issues for determination by this Court. Therefore, for the sake of convenience, the facts mentioned in W.P.No.17100 of 2025 are referred to in this order.

3. The prayer sought in the present Writ Petition is as under:

“It is therefore prayed that this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to issue a Writ or Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondent No.2 herein in approving the tentative layout su

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top