Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
G. S. KULKARNI, ADVAIT M. SETHNA, JJ
Abhay V. Khinvasara – Appellant
Versus
State Of Maharashtra – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
G.S. Kulkarni, J.
| A | Preface |
| B | Facts |
| C | Reply Affidavit of the MIDC |
| D | Reply Affidavit of the State Government |
| E | Rejoinder Affidavits |
| F | Submissions on behalf of the Petitioner |
| G | Submissions on behalf of the MIDC |
| H | Submissions on behalf of the State Government and SLAO |
| I | Analysis |
A. Preface
1. This petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India primarily challenges the acquisition of the petitioner’s land described in the petition to be Survey No.137/2 at village Akurdi, Taluka Haveli, District Pune, under the provisions of the Maharashtra Industrial Development Act , 1961 (for short ‘the MID Act’), which had attained finality in the year 1971, the possession of which was taken over on 11 February 1972 under the panchnama dated 21 January 1972 and 11 February 1972.
2. At the outset it may be stated that this petition was filed on 31 July 2010 and as seen from the cause title of the petition, the petitioner has described himself to be 45 years of age. Hence, when the land acquisition took place culminating into the possession of the land being taken over, the petitioner was 7 years of age. We observe so as we are quite astonished with the verification clause to this petition, when the pe
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
