Ganesh Bhivsen Zende vs State

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

BOMBAY HIGH COURT
Mr. Harshawardhan Suryawanshi, J
Ganesh Bhivsen Zende – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr. Harshawardhan Suryawanshi
For the Respondents: Mrs. P. R. Bharaswadkar

Table of Content
1. evaluating lawful justification for detention orders. (Para 3 , 4 , 5)
2. assessing subjective satisfaction and legal compliance in preventive detention. (Para 6 , 7)
3. conclusion quashing detention with affirmation of legal thresholds. (Para 8 , 9)

1. Heard learned Advocate Mr. Harshawardhan Suryawanshi for the petitioner and learned APP Mrs. P. R. Bharaswadkar for the respondents - State.

2. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith. The petition is heard finally with the consent of the learned Advocates for the parties.

3. The petitioner challenges the detention order dated 2810.2024 bearing No.DC / DESK - 9C1/1336/2024 passed by respondent No.2 as well as the approval order dated 07.11.2024 and the confirmation order dated 18.12.2024 passed by respondent No.1, by invoking the powers of this Court under Art.226 of the Constitution of India.

4. Learned Advocate for the petitioner has taken us through the impugned orders and the material which was supplied to the petitioner by the detaining authority after passing of the order. He submits that though several offences were registered against the petitioner, yet for the purpose of passing the impugned order, four offences

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

BOMBAY HIGH COURTMr. Harshawardhan Suryawanshi, JGanesh Bhivsen Zende – AppellantVersusState – Respondent

Cases Referred (6)

BOMBAY HIGH COURT
Mr. Harshawardhan Suryawanshi, J
Ganesh Bhivsen Zende – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent