Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
Sandeep V. Marne, J
Godrej And Boyce Manufacturing Company Limited – Appellant
Versus
Remi Sales and Engineering Limited – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. factual background and history of the arbitration proceedings. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 2. petitioner's contentions regarding patent illegality and contractual modification of the sale of goods act. (Para 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 3. respondent's arguments on the limited scope of section 34 review. (Para 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18) |
| 4. analysis of whether the goods matched contractual specifications (factual findings). (Para 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30) |
| 5. application of section 42 of the sale of goods act and effect of 'acceptance'. (Para 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 , 46 , 47 , 48 , 49 , 50) |
| 6. assessment of alleged defects and waiver via the doctrine of election. (Para 51 , 52 , 53 , 54 , 55 , 56 , 57 , 58 , 59 , 60 , 61 , 62 , 63 , 64 , 65 , 66) |
JUDGMENT
1) Petitioner has filed the present Petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (Arbitration Act) challenging the Award of the learned sole Arbitrator dated 8 February 2023. By the impugned Award, the learned sole Arbitrator has awarded sum of Rs. 4,25,44,680/- alongwith interest @10% p.a. in favour of the Respo
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
