Back
HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY
Manish Pitale, Shreeram V. Shirsat, JJ
Pune Ex-servicemen Co-operative Housing Society Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Municipal Corporation of City of Pune – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. challenges to rule 13.3.1.5 validity under article 300a. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. factual background of pre-1987 sanctioned layouts and pmc notices. (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17) |
| 3. petitioners argue rule ultra vires, illusory compensation. (Para 18 , 19) |
| 4. respondents defend rule as valid law, police power. (Para 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24) |
| 5. article 300a protects property as human right requiring fairness. (Para 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30) |
| 6. declarations constitute acquisition, not mere management. (Para 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38) |
| 7. prior judgments strike similar rules for illusory compensation. (Para 39 , 40 , 41) |
| 8. rule ultra vires bpmc act, arbitrary under article 14. (Para 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 , 46 , 47) |
| 9. undefined 'misuse'; structures permitted in open spaces. (Para 48 , 49) |
| 10. distinguishes vasanth case; rule lacks statutory basis. (Para 50 , 51 , 52 , 53 , 54) |
| 11. pre-rules layouts; no token compensation justified. (Para 55 , 56) |
| 12. rule unconstitutional; declarations quashed, status quo restored. (Para 57 , 58 , 59) |
JUDGEMENT : (Per Justice Manish Pitale)
. These petitions challenge the constitutional validity of Rule
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
