Back
CALCUTTA HIGH COURT
X, J
Ram Gopal Neotia v. State
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. details regarding the appeal against the magistrate's orders. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. counsel raised objections concerning the legal standing of supplementary charge-sheets. (Para 5 , 6) |
| 3. examines the law on supplementary charge-sheets and de novo trials. (Para 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18) |
| 4. final ruling nullified the magistrate's orders. (Para 19) |
1. The petitioner in criminal revision case No. 893 of 1965 obtained the present rule against the order of the learned Magistrate virtually scrapping the proceedings gone through by him in an inquiry under Chapter XVIII of the Code of Criminal Procedure and directing a de novo inquiry. The petitioner in Criminal Revision Case No. 925 of 1965 obtained the rule against the order of the same Magistrate summoning him on a supplementary charge - sheet filed by the investigating officer for an alleged offence under S.120B / 420 of the Indian Penal Code for an inquiry into the offence jointly with the other accused persons named in the original charge - sheet.
2. On a complaint filed by one Bindu Bhusan Bhattacharjee, the police submitted a charge - sheet against the petitioner in case No. 893 of 19
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
