Back
CALCUTTA HIGH COURT
Ajay Kumar Gupta, J
Enforcement Directorate through D.N. Poddar, Deputy Director – Appellant
Versus
Papia Rozario & Anr. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. summary of case background and allegations (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. arguments on the validity of the pmla proceedings (Para 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 3. counterarguments against the applicability of the pmla (Para 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11) |
| 4. court's findings on the pmla and scheduled offences (Para 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24) |
| 5. analysis of the interpretation of money laundering offences (Para 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29) |
| 6. final determination of the trial court's error (Para 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34) |
| 7. conclusion and orders of the court (Para 35 , 36) |
| 8. administrative follow-up to the judgment (Para 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41) |
JUDGMENT :
Ajay Kumar Gupta, J.
1. The instant Criminal Revisional application has been preferred by the Enforcement Directorate through its Deputy Director under Sections 397 , 401 & 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (in short Cr.P.C.) read with Section 47 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 (in short ‘PMLA’), challenging the correctness, legality and propriety of the order dated 15.12.2017 passed by the Learned Special (CBI) Court No. 1, Calcutta and Special Court of PMLA, Calcutta in ML Case No. 02 of 2013 (Enforcement Directorate through Sh. D.N. Poddar,
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
