Back
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA
KRISHNA RAO
Pushpa Sharma – Appellant
Versus
State of West Bengal – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. writ petition for possession of property (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 2. petitioner's claim for maintenance increase (Para 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 3. counterarguments against the mother's case (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15) |
| 4. clarification on maintenance allowance legality (Para 18 , 19 , 20) |
| 5. interpretation of the maintenance act provisions (Para 21 , 22 , 23 , 24) |
| 6. inapplicability of section 23 in this case (Para 26 , 27 , 28) |
| 7. maintainability of writ petitions (Para 29 , 30 , 31) |
| 8. jurisdiction under article 226 and article 227 (Para 32 , 33 , 34) |
| 9. judicial acts and writ jurisdiction principles (Para 35 , 36 , 37) |
| 10. high court's jurisdiction over tribunal orders (Para 38 , 39) |
Judgment :
Krishna Rao, J.
1. Smt. Pushpa Sharma filed the present writ petition being WPA No. 10504 of 2025 praying for a direction upon the respondent nos. 5 and 6 i.e. Shri Shyam Sundar Sharma and Gajanand Sharma to hand over the possession of the immovable property belonging to her situated at Rangamati, District- Paschim Medinipur, comprising 2 cottahs of land, consisting of a three (3) storied building in terms of the orders passed by the Sub-Divisional Officer dated 6th September, 2024 a
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
