Maya Devi vs Vishweshwar Dayal - 2023 Supreme(Raj) 1458

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2023 Supreme(Raj) 1458

GANESH RAM MEENA
Maya Devi – Appellant
Versus
Vishweshwar Dayal – Respondent

Advocates appeared:
Mr. Yunus Khan, Advocate, Mr. Vijay Kumar Khandelwal, Advocate, Mr. Virendra Dave, Advocate, Mr. Rajveer Singh, Advocate, Mr. P.L. Saini, Advocate, Mr. J.K. Gupta, Advocate, Mr. Satyapal Poshwal, Advocate, Mr. Pramod Kumar Sharma, Advocate, Mr. S.N. Meena, Advocate, Mr. Kuldeep Aswal, Advocate, Mr. Ashok Meena, Advocate, Mr. B.L. Choudhary, Advocate, Mr. Umesh Vyas, Advocate, Mr. Manoj Sharma, Advocate, Mr. Abhishek Pareek, Advocate, Mr. Manish K Sharma, Advocate, Mr. Asgar Khan, Advocate, Mr. A.K. Sharma, Advocate, Mr. Kumud Singh, Advocate, Mr. Akshat Tyagi, Advocate, Mr. Pushpendra Kumar Panddey, Advocate, Mr. Saurabh Bhandari, Advocate, Mr. P.S. Sirohi, Advocate, Mr. Ravi Shankar Sharma, Advocate, Ms. Rashmi Jain, Advocate, Mr. Ravi Kant Agarwal, Advocate, Mr. R.C. Sharma, Advocate, Mr. Rajat Ranjan, Advocate, Mr. Darshan Shree, Advocate, Mr. Mohd. Umar Farooq, Advocate, Mr. Sunil Kumar Jain, Advocate, Mr. Satish Kumar Khandelwal, Advocate, Mr. Ram Amit Sharma, Advocate, Mr. Ramit Pareek, Advocate, Mr. Dharmendra Jain, Advocate, Mr. Arvind Kumar Arora, Advocate, Mr. Rajesh Kumar Sain, Advocate, Ms. Akanksha Saxena, Advocate, Mr. Abdul Kalam Kham, Advocate, Mr. Amil Ali, Advocate, Mr. Sandeep Sharma, Advocate, Mr. Manu Bhargava, Advocate, Mr. Shashi Kant Saini, Advocate, Mr. Mamraj Jat, Advocate, Mr. Yogesh Kumar Gupta, Advocate, Mr. Gurpreet Singh Sodhi, Advocate, Mr. Govind Sharma, Advocate, Mr. K.K. Mathur, Advocate, Mr. Himanshu Sharma, Advocate, Mr. Anupam Sharma, Advocate, Mr. T.L. Pandey, Advocate, Mr. Ram Rakh Sharma, Advocate, Mr. Pradeep Kumar Sharma, Advocate, Mr. Martand Pratap Singh, Advocate, Mr. Sanjay Yadav, Advocate, Mr. Manoj Kumar Bhardwaj, Advocate, Mr. P.C. Sharma, Advocate, Mr. Santosh Choudhary, Advocate, Mr. Rajesh Kala, Advocate, Mr. Sunil Kumar Jain, Advocate, Mr. Sultan Singh Kuri, Advocate, Mr. Arvind Kumar Bhardwaj, Advocate and Mr. Surya Prakash, Advocate, for the Appellant; Mr. R.D. Rastogi, ASG, with Mr. Vaibhav Jeswani, Advocate, Mr. Devesh Yadav, Advocate, Mr. C.S. Sinha, Advocate, Mr. Asad Sheikh, Advocate, Mr. Vijendra Yadav, Advocate, Ms. Sunita Mehla, Advocate, Mr. Sanjay Mehla, Advocate, Mr. Prahlad Sharma, Advocate, Mr. Sourabh Jain, Advocate, Mr. Deepak Kothiwal, Advocate, Mr. P.C. Bhandhari, Advocate, Mr. B.B. Pareek, Advocate, Mr. Vikram Singh Shekhwat, Advocate, Mr. Arvind Bhardwaj, Advocate, Mr. J.K. Yogi, Advocate, Mr. Dharmendra Pareek, AGC, Mr. Arvind Sharma, Advocate, Mr. Ravi Bhojak, Advocate, Mr. Pankaj Sharma, Advocate, Mr. Anil Kumar Garg, Advocate, Mr. Padam Singh Gurjar, Advocate, Mr. Ashish Agarwal, Advocate, Mr. Sanjay Rahar, Advocate, Mr. R.D. Tripathi, Advocate, Mr. Rajneesh Gupta, Advocate, Mr. Abhi Goyal, Advocate, Mr. M.S. Shekhwat, Advocate, Mr. Nishant Sharma, Advocate, Mr. Kailash Choudhary, Advocate, Mr. K.C. Sharma, Advocate, Mr. Ajay Kumar Jain, Advocate, Mr. V.S. Agarwal, Advocate, Mr. Balram Vashistha, Advocate, Mr. S.L. Sharma, Advocate, Mr. Mohd. Akbar, Advocate, Mr. S.K. Tiwari, Advocate, Mr. Amit Dadhich, Advocate, Mr. Anoop Pareek, Advocate, Ms. Kamla Jain, Advocate, Mr. D.S. Naruka, Advocate, Mr. P.S. Naruka, Advocate, Mr. M.S. Gothwal, Advocate, Mr. Karnal Singh, Advocate, Mr. Sandeep Sharma, Advocate, Mr. Mohit Pareek, Advocate, Mr. Arun Sharma, Advocate, Mr. G.S. Rathore, Advocate, Mr. S.S. Hora, Advocate, Mr. Rishikesh Mahrishi, Advocate, Mr. Narendra Mewara, Advocate, Mr. Pushpendra Sharma, Advocate, Mr. Ravi Saini, Advocate, Mr. Sanwar Mal, Advocate, Mr. Suresh Kumar Dhenwal, Advocate, Mr. Govind Choudhary, Advocate, Mr. R.B. Sharma Ganthola, Advocate, Mr. Ajay Gupta, Advocate, Mr. Naveen Dhuwan, Advocate & Mr. Pradeep Bochaliya, Advocate, for the Respondent.

JUDGMENT

1. These batch of writ petitions have been filed by the petitioners/non-applicants under section 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the orders passed under section 9 of 'The Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizen Act, 2007' (for short 'the Act of 2007') by the Maintenance Tribunal constituted under Section 7 of the Act of 2007 on an application for maintenance filed under section 5 of the Act of 2007.

2. S.B. Civil Writ Petition Nos.17596/2018 and 14495/2020 have been filed by the petitioners against the orders passed by the Appellate Tribunal constituted under Section 15 of the Act of 2007 on filing of appeals under section 16 of the Act of 2007, whereby the Appellate Tribunal dismissed the appeals being not maintainable.

3. For ready reference, the facts of S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.11941/2021, Maya Devi Vs. Vishweshwar Dayal & Anr., are being taken into consideration.

In this case, the respondents/ applicants namely; Vishweshwar Dayal and Sampat Devi filed an application under the provisions of the Act of 2007 before the Maintenance Tribunal with the prayer to dispossess the petitioner/non-applicant Maya Devi from their residential house. It was s