IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA
SUPRATIM BHATTACHARYA
Soumen Ghosh – Appellant
Versus
Sati Mondal – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
SUPRATIM BHATTACHARYA, J.
1. The present appeal has been preferred by the appellants being aggrieved by and dissatisfied with the judgment dated 22.03.2017 passed by the Ld. Additional District Judge, 4th Court Suri, Birbhum in Title Appeal No. 73 of 2013.
2. Through the impugned judgment the Ld. First Appellate Court has affirmed the judgment and decree dated 26.07.2013 passed by the Ld. Civil Judge (Sr. Divn.), Suri, Birbhum in Title suit No. 27 of 2007, thereby dismissing the title appeal. Through the said judgment the Ld. Trial Court has passed the judgment in preliminary form.
3. Factual Matrix:
The present lis involves partition of suit property. The title suit has been filed by Smt. Sati Mondal and Anima Kabiraj against the defendants seeking partition of the suit property left by their great grand-father namely Siddheswar Ghosh.
The Trial Court ultimately decreed the suit in preliminary form and declared that the plaintiffs have 5/18th share in the suit property and the remaining portion of the suit property be given to the defendants.
Being aggrieved by and dissatisfied with the preliminary decree passed by the Trial Court the defendants No. 2, 3, 4, 12, 13 and 14 name
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.