IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA
ANIRUDDHA ROY, J
USHA MARTIN LIMITED – Appellant
Versus
BALURGHAT TECHNOLOGIES LIMITED – Respondent
1. This is a commercial suit. The defendant has not filed its written statement. The defendant has forfeited its right to file written statement under the amended provisions of Rule 1 to Order VIII of CPC, 1908.
2. Examination-in-chief of the plaintiff’s witness has been concluded. Though the suit has been marked as undefended but the defendant did not choose to cross-examine the witness of the plaintiff. In this regard, reliance has been placed on an order dated February 25, 2025 passed by the Co-ordinate Bench.
3. Today, the plaintiff has come up with an application with the following prayers:
“(a) Leave be granted to the petitioner to disclose the documents annexed as "C-1" to "F" of the instant application;
(b) Leave be granted to the petitioner to prepare Additional Judges Brief of Documents containing the documents annexed as "C-1" to "F" of the instant application and file the same within four weeks from the date of the order to be made herein, or within such time as to this Hon'ble Court may seem fit and proper;
(c) Leave be granted to the petitioner to file Affidavit of Evidence of its second witness, Mr. Gautam Das, within six weeks from the date of the order to be made herein
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.