Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Rajiv Joshi, Judicial Member
Noorain Ansari – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. applicant's repeated compassionate appointment applications rejected despite representations. (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 18 , 19 , 20) |
| 2. applicant's low merit points justify non-selection over higher scorers. (Para 10 , 11 , 13 , 14 , 16) |
| 3. 18-year delay defeats compassionate appointment purpose. (Para 12 , 15) |
| 4. application dismissed for unclean hands and material concealment. (Para 17 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 28) |
| 5. compassionate appointment is exception for immediate financial crisis only. (Para 24 , 25 , 26 , 27) |
| 6. original application dismissed without costs. (Para 29 , 30) |
ORDER
Heard Shri Subhash Singh Yadav, learned counsel for the applicant and Shri Narendra Pratap Singh, learned counsel for the respondents.
2. This Original Application is filed under section 19 of the Administrative Tribunal Act, 1985, seeking relief for a direction upon the respondents to consider the case of the applicant for appointment on compassionate ground.
3. The brief facts of the case are that the applicant’s father employed as a Security Guard under the Respondent-2- Director, Indian Veterinary Research Institute, Ijjat Nagar, District Bareilly and died in harness on 27.07.2006, le
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
