Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Rameshwar Vyas, Judicial Member
D.K. Bohra – Appellant
Versus
Kendriya Vidhyalaya Sangathan (KVS) – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. applicant's employment history and scheme switches (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. parties' claims on option exercise (Para 3) |
| 3. oral arguments and cited precedents (Para 5 , 6) |
| 4. interpretation of 1988 om and precedents (Para 7) |
| 5. evidence of applicant's cpf option (Para 8 , 9) |
ORDER
Per Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rameshwar Vyas, Member (J)
Being aggrieved by Memorandum dated 13/17.05.2022 (Annexure-A/1) whereby the applicant was not allowed to switch over from CPF to GPF-cum-Pension Scheme, the applicant, in second round of litigation, has preferred this OA for direction to consider his services as governed by GPF-cum-Pension Scheme w.e.f. 01.09.1988 pursuant to Memorandum dated 01.09.1988 (Annexure-A/3).
2. Facts of the case in brief are as under:-
2.1 The applicant was initially appointed as Primary Teacher (PRT) under the KVS. In 1983 at the time of his joining, he opted for the CPF Scheme. Prior to 1986 in KVS, there were two Schemes i.e. General Provident Fund (GPF)-cum-Pension Scheme and the Contributory Provident Fund (CPF) and employees of the KVS had an option, to be a member of the CPF Scheme or the GPF Scheme. The terminal monetary benefits were admissible under both the Scheme
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
