Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Om Prakash VII, J, Mohan Pyare, Administrative Member
Balbir Singh – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. factual background of vigilance inspection and disciplinary proceedings. (Para 2) |
| 2. applicant's contentions on coerced signatures and disproportionate punishment. (Para 3) |
| 3. respondents' defense of valid preventive check and proven charges. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 4. tribunal consideration of rival submissions and evidence. (Para 6 , 7) |
| 5. limited judicial review in disciplinary proceedings; no re-appreciation of evidence. (Para 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17) |
| 6. vigilance manual non-binding; prejudice required for vitiation. (Para 18) |
| 7. vigilance officer's misconduct irrelevant to applicant's case. (Para 19) |
| 8. application dismissed; no interference warranted. (Para 20) |
ORDER
By Hon’ble Mr. Mohan Pyare, Member (A)
Present Original Application has been filed under Section 19 of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985, seeking the following relief:
“(i) To issue order and direction to quash the impugned order punishment order dated 06-05-2011 (A-1) and impugned appellate order dated 26-07-2011 (A-2) and impugned revisional order dated 12-10-2011 (A-2a) with all consequential benefits.
(ii) To issue order or direction to restore the original post, pay and grade of the ap
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
