SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(CAT) 2059

CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Vishal Upadhyay – Appellant
Versus
Union Public Service Commission – Respondent


O R D E R

Hon’ble Mr. Rajinder Kashyap, Member (A):-

By filing the present O.A. under Section 19 of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985, the applicants have sought the following reliefs:-

"(a) Quash and set aside the final result dated 11.11.2025 and cut off notice dated 22.12.2025, insofar as they exclude the Applicants from selection to the post of Personal Assistant, on the basis of undisclosed and post-examination Skill Test criteria;

(b) Declare that exclusion of the Applicants from selection on the basis of post-examination Skill Test criteria, is arbitrary and violative of Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution of India

(c) Direct the Respondents to exercise the power of relaxation in terms of the recruitment advertisement, revise the result dated 11.11.2025 and consider the Applicants for appointment against the existing vacancies.

(d) Pass any other order as this Hon'ble Tribunal may deem fit in the interest of justice."

FACTS OF THE CASE

2. The present Original Application has been filed under Section 19 of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985, by the applicants seeking interference by this Tribunal in an ongoing recruitment process conducted by the respondents. The principa

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top