Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Kumar Rajesh Chandra, Member
Vijay Kumar Verma – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. applicant challenges pay reduction and recovery from retiral benefits. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. arguments against retrospective refixation and recovery sans notice or fraud. (Para 3) |
| 3. respondents justify corrective recast enforcing prior punishments. (Para 4) |
| 4. corrective pay refixation valid; recovery permissible for excess from punishments. (Para 6) |
| 5. application dismissed; no interference warranted. (Para 7) |
O R D E R
PER: - MR. KUMAR RAJESH CHANDRA, MEMBER [A]
1.The applicant has approached this Tribunal under Section 19 of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 praying for the following relief:
“8.1 That your Lordships may graciously be pleased to quash and set aside the orders dated 13.02.2024, 23.04.2024 and Settlement Calculation Sheet issued by the respondents as contained in Annexure A/1, A/2 and A/3 whereby basic pay has been reduced from Rs. 95800/- to Rs. 93000/- and recovery of Rs. 467448/- has been realized from DCRG against overpayment.
8.2 That your Lordships may graciously be pleased to direct/ command the respondents to refund the amount of Rs. 467448/- recovered from DCRG against overpayment with statutory interest without any delay.
8.3 That your Lordships
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
