Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
B.K. Shrivastava, Member (J), Santosh Mehra, Member(A)
Girish Kumar D – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. factual background of disciplinary proceedings initiation. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. applicant's arguments on procedural flaws and bias. (Para 3) |
| 3. respondents' defense on fair inquiry conduct. (Para 4) |
| 4. applicant's rejoinder challenging charge validity. (Para 5) |
| 5. court analysis rejecting bias claims. (Para 6) |
O R D E R
Per: Hon’ble Shri Santosh Mehra ……Member(A)
Through this OA, the applicant has sought the following reliefs:
(a) Call for records of the case from the respondents and on perusal
(b) quash and set aside the Order bearing No. NKR/VIG/DISC/1024/2021 dated 07.01.2025 (Annexure A1) passed by Second respondent;
(c) and issue a consequential direction to the respondents to introduce disputed document (ANNEXURE A6) through rightful custodian after given an opportunity to inspect original document.
(d) I further humbly pray to the Honorable Tribunal to direct the respondents to conduct the proceedings in a fair and impartial manner with the appointment of an unbiased Inquiry Officer
(e) Grant such other relief/s as this Hon'ble Tribunal deems fit to grant to the applicant in the circumstances of the case including an order as to costs in the interests of justice.
1. The fac
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
