KULDIP SINGH, A.M.AHMADI, K.JAGANNATHA SHETTY
Union Of India: Parma Nanda – Appellant
Versus
Parma Nanda: State Of Haryana – Respondent
JUDGMENT
K. JAGANNATHA SHETTY, J. :— The civil appeal, by special leave, and the connected SLP raise an important issue as to the power of. the Central Administration Tribunal ("Tribunal") to examine the adequacy of penalty awarded by the competent authority to a Government servant in disciplinary proceedings.
2. Short factual background is this :
Parmanand - Respondent in the appeal was a Time Keeper in Beas Sutlej Link Project, Sundernagar. He was in charge of preparing the pay bills and other bills of the work charged employees of the project. It was alleged that he master-minded and prepared the pay roll pertaining to T Token of Central Survey Division, Sundernagar for the month of May 1969 and entered the name of one Shri Ashok Kumar, Token No. 59-T at serial No. 10 on page 2 of the relevant pay roll. He made this entry with ulterior motive to withdraw the pay of Ashok Kumar for the month of May 1969, even though Ashok Kumar was not working in that Division. A bogus identity card in the name of Ashok Kumar T.No. 59-T with the signatures of the issuing officer was also prepared by the respondent although it was not his duty to prepare the identity card. The said fictitious identi
explained : Bhagat Ram v. State of H. P.
relied on : State of Orissa v. Bidyabhushan Mohapatra
Dhirajlal Girdhanlal v. Commissioner of Income Tax
State of Maharashtra v. B. K. Takkamore
Railway Board v. Niranjan Singh
State of U. P. v. Om Prakash Gupta
Union of India v. Sardar Bahadur
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.