SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(CAT) 3923

CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Pramod Kumar Das, Member (A)
1026/2025


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Ld. Counsel for the applicant

Table of Content
1. applicant's long casual service and comparators regularized (Para 1 , 2 , 9)
2. cat jurisdiction over casual employees' regularization upheld (Para 3 , 4)
3. regularization despite irregular engagement per apex court rulings (Para 5 , 6)
4. non-discrimination mandates similar treatment for comparators (Para 7 , 8)
5. oa allowed with regularization directions (Para 11)

PRAMOD KUMAR DAS, MEMBER (A):

It is not in dispute that the applicant has been continuing to serve the department on casual basis uninterruptedly over more than two decades i.e. since 05.09.2000 till date and meanwhile became overaged to seek any employment in Government for sustenance of livelihood. Also, the respondents did not dispute the fact that 18 casual workers working in Bhubaneswar Commissionerate were regularized vide order dated 04.03.2011 and 64 similar causal workers working under Lucknow Commissionerate were also regularized vide order No. 130 dated 17.02.2025 retrospectively w.e.f. 22.01.2010. According to the applicant/Ld. Counsel for the applicant, the applicant is also entitled to regularization and all consequential servile and financial benefits retrospectivelJya gasg op eVr rtsh.e U

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top