CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Pramod Kumar Das, Member (A)
1026/2025
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. applicant's long casual service and comparators regularized (Para 1 , 2 , 9) |
| 2. cat jurisdiction over casual employees' regularization upheld (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. regularization despite irregular engagement per apex court rulings (Para 5 , 6) |
| 4. non-discrimination mandates similar treatment for comparators (Para 7 , 8) |
| 5. oa allowed with regularization directions (Para 11) |
PRAMOD KUMAR DAS, MEMBER (A):
It is not in dispute that the applicant has been continuing to serve the department on casual basis uninterruptedly over more than two decades i.e. since 05.09.2000 till date and meanwhile became overaged to seek any employment in Government for sustenance of livelihood. Also, the respondents did not dispute the fact that 18 casual workers working in Bhubaneswar Commissionerate were regularized vide order dated 04.03.2011 and 64 similar causal workers working under Lucknow Commissionerate were also regularized vide order No. 130 dated 17.02.2025 retrospectively w.e.f. 22.01.2010. According to the applicant/Ld. Counsel for the applicant, the applicant is also entitled to regularization and all consequential servile and financial benefits retrospectivelJya gasg op eVr rtsh.e U
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.