Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Sunil Thomas, Member (J), Sanjiv Kumar, Member (A)
Uttam Thapa – Appellant
Versus
Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. applicants are long-term casual bsnl laborers seeking regularization. (Para 1) |
| 2. 1989 scheme for casual laborer temporary status and regularization. (Para 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 3. prior representations and tribunal orders rejected applicants' claims. (Para 5 , 6) |
| 4. respondents deny eligibility citing uma devi and scheme cutoffs. (Para 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 5. undisputed long engagement despite lacking scheme eligibility. (Para 13 , 14) |
| 6. uma devi permits regularization of irregular long-term engagements. (Para 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20) |
| 7. post-uma devi rulings reject exploitation via prolonged casual employment. (Para 21 , 22 , 23 , 24) |
| 8. state cannot deny regularization for perennial work despite no vacancies. (Para 25 , 26 , 27 , 28) |
| 9. applicants entitled to regularization with consequential benefits. (Para 29) |
O R D E R
Per: Justice Sunil Thomas, Judicial Member -
The applicants who are employed under the respondents as casual labourers seek regularization of their service.
2. The applicants were employed as casual labourers under the respondent BSNL authorities during the period 1997 to 1999. They were appointed for administrative exigencies due to acute shortage of wor
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
