Back
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL
Jayesh V Bhairavia, Member (J), Hukum Singh Meena, Member (A)
Falguni W/o Devang Parmar – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. factual background of selection process and cancellation (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. applicants' arguments against cancellation arbitrariness (Para 4) |
| 3. respondents' defense of procedural irregularities (Para 5) |
| 4. rebuttal on representations and master circular violations (Para 6) |
| 5. undisputed facts and issues for consideration (Para 7 , 8 , 9) |
| 6. impugned orders unsustainable absent grave irregularities (Para 10) |
| 7. estoppel bars post-participation challenges (Para 11) |
| 8. irregularities minor, curable by supplementary selection (Para 12) |
| 9. cancellation arbitrary, violates articles 14/16 (Para 13) |
| 10. quash cancellation, direct promotions (Para 14 , 15 , 16) |
Per: Hon’ble Shri Jayesh V Bhairavia, Member (J)
The issue involved in both the OAs i.e. OA No. 208/2025 and OA No.
209/2025 arises from a common set of facts and relief sought by the applicants therein are also common nature, therefore, with the consent of learned counsel for the parties and for the sake of convenience and clarity, the pleading of O.A. No.208/2025 (Ms.Falguni Devang Parmar Vs. UOI &
Anr.) is referred to as the lead case for adjudication.
1.1 The applicants, by way of the present Original Application(s), assai
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
