Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
NARENDRA KUMAR VYAS
Mahetarin Bai, Wd/o. Late Keju Ram Satnami – Appellant
Versus
Jiwanlal, S/o. Kejuram – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. appeal filed under section 100 cpc regarding legal heir challenge. (Para 1 , 3 , 12) |
| 2. suit details and evidence regarding the legal heir's rights. (Para 6 , 9 , 28) |
| 3. court's evaluation of necessary parties and applicable laws. (Para 18 , 24 , 26) |
| 4. final dismissal of appeal based on reassessment of rights. (Para 29 , 31) |
JUDGMENT :
1. The appellant has filed this Second Appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 against the judgment and decree dated 22-3-2018 (Annexure A/2) passed by the learned District Judge, Bemetara, District Bemetara in Civil Appeal No. 14-A/2017 by which learned First Appellate Court has partly allowed the appeal and modified the judgment and decree dated 17-5-2017 (Annexure A/1) passed by the learned Civil Judge, Class -1 Bemetara in Civil Suit No. 37-A/2014 (Annexure A/1), declared the plaintiff Hirmat Bai as legal heir of late Kejuram being daughter to the extent of 1/3rd share of the property. Learned First Appellate Court has also directed the Revenue Authority to divide the share of Hirmat Bai as per Order 20 Rule 18 read with Section 54 of the CPC.
3. This appeal has been admitted by this Court on 13-7-2018 on the f
A necessary party must be included in a suit to determine rights effectively; remedies under Order 1 Rule 10 CPC and Hindu Succession Act were upheld.
Order 1 Rule 10 CPC casts duty upon court to ensure impleadment and deletion of party, which may or may not be necessary for adjudication of case.
The appellate court affirmed a daughter's entitlement to inherit property equally due to her established lineage and the 2005 amendments to inheritance laws granting daughters coparcener rights.
A son born from a void marriage has rights to inheritance under amendments to the Hindu Succession Act, affirming equal status to legitimate and illegitimate children in claims for partition post the....
The omission of Section 23 of the Hindu Succession Act allows a married daughter to seek partition in joint family property, disregarding her marital status and absence of other daughters.
The inclusion of all necessary parties in a partition suit is critical for effective adjudication, recognizing the rights of female heirs under the Hindu Succession Act.
A partition suit is non-maintainable if necessary parties, such as co-sharers, are not included, as effective decrees cannot be passed without their presence.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
