SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2012 Supreme(Online)(Chh) 78

IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
, J
Manoj Kumar Sharma – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent


Table of Content
1. factual background of the case. (Para 1 , 2)
2. basis of the new fir registration. (Para 3)
3. petition for quashing fir. (Para 4)
4. claim of abuse of process by petitioners. (Para 5)
5. defense against the petitioners' claims. (Para 6)
6. court's analysis on fir validity. (Para 7 , 12)
7. discussion of fir requirements. (Para 8 , 9 , 10)
8. discussion on fir jurisdiction issues. (Para 11 , 15)
9. assessment of allegations against the petitioners. (Para 14 , 17)
10. conclusion on the continuation of proceedings. (Para 18 , 19)
11. order of the court. (Para 20)

1. This petition under S.482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (hereinafter referred to as "the Code") has been filed by the petitioners for quashing FIR dated 29.5.2005 registered under Crime No. 194/05 and all connected criminal proceedings by police of Police Station - Bhilai Nagar, District Durg, alleging commission of offence under S.304 - B and S.498 - A read with S.34 of the IPC.

2. The relevant and necessary facts giving rise to instant petition are that petitioner No.1 - Manoj Kumar Sharma was married to Nandani, daughter of R. P. Sharma on 27.4.1999. While the deceased Nandni Sharma was residing with


Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top