SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(Online)(Chh) 435

IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH
R. V. Raveendran, J
Dinesh Kumar v. State of Chhattisgarh and Others


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Vaibhav Goverdhan
For the Respondents: Kachhawaha

1. R. V. Raveendran, J. in the matter of CBSE and another v. Aditya Bandhopadhyay, 2011 (8) SCC 497 : 2011 AIR SCW 4888 speaking for the Supreme Court pertinently observed qua right to information as under:

"The right to information is a cherished right. Information and right to information are intended to be formidable tools in the hands of responsible citizens to fight corruption and to bring in transparency and accountability. The provisions of Right to Information Act should be enforced strictly and all efforts should be made to bring to light under Clause (b) of S.4(1) of the Act, which relates to securing transparency and accountability of working of public authorities and in discouraging corruption."

2. Feeling deprived of abovestated right to information by enhancement / prescription of fee as Rs.500/- for submission of the application for getting information with a fee of Rs.15/- per page by amending R.5 and R.6(1) of Chhattisgarh Vidhan Sabha Secretariat Right to Information (Regulation of Fees and Costs) Rules, 2011 as amended (hereinafter referred to as "Rules, 2011"), the petitioner herein acting pro bono publico has filed this writ petition calling in question the const


Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top