Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
Parth Prateem Sahu, J
Ram Sudin Sahu – Appellant
Versus
State Of Chhattisgarh – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. summary of facts leading to disciplinary action and challenge. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. parties' contentions regarding procedural fairness and penalty severity. (Para 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 3. procedural violations in the departmental enquiry process. (Para 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36) |
| 4. disproportionality of punishment and final court orders. (Para 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44) |
CAV Order
1. Petitioner, invoking jurisdiction of this Court under Article 226 of Constitution of India has questioned the legality and sustainability of order dated 12th March 2025 whereby appellate authority has dismissed the appeal filed by the petitioner (delinquent employee) under Rule 23 of the Chhattisgarh Civil Services (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules, 1966 (hereinafter referred to as “Rules of 1966”) affirming the order of punishment imposed upon the petitioner of major penalty of compulsorily retiring the petitioner vide order dated 26.06.2024 passed by Commissioner, Land Records, Chhattisgarh, Raipur.
2. Facts relevant for disposal of this writ petition are tha
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
