Back
CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION
Vinod Kumar Tiwari, IC
Rinku Verma – Appellant
Versus
PIO, Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. facts regarding the rti request and response. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. arguments presented by the parties during the hearing. (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 3. court's observations on exemption of personal information. (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13) |
| 4. final decision disposing of the appeal. (Para 14) |
Baba Gangnath Marg, Munirka नई िद(cid:24)ी, New Delhi – 110067 File No: CIC/OICOL/A/2024/607770 Rinku Verma .….अपीलकता(cid:18)/Appellant VERSUS बनाम PIO, Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd., Jeevan Bhawan, 3rd Floor, 43, Hazratganj, Lucknow – 226001 ….(cid:29)ितवादीगण /Respondent Date of Hearing : 27.06.2025 Date of Decision : 02.07.2025 INFORMATION COMMISSIONER : Vinod Kumar Tiwari Relevant facts emerging from appeal:
RTI application filed on : 29.09.2023 CPIO replied on : 12.10.2023 First appeal filed on : 23.10.2023 First Appellate Authority’s order : 09.11.2023 2nd Appeal/Complaint dated : 16.01.2024 Information sought:
1. The Appellant filed an RTI application dated 29.09.2023 (offline) seeking the following information:
“Kindly provide the names & addresses with their telephone numbers whom claim has been rejected under the Government welfare scheme i.e. Samajvadi Krishak Durghatna Beema Yo
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
