Back
CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION
Anandi Ramalingam, IC
Anitya Prasad Das – Appellant
Versus
State Bank of India, Kolkata – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. factual background and information sought via rti. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 6 , 7) |
| 2. hearing details and parties present during the appeal. (Para 5) |
| 3. appropriateness of cpio's denial based on personal information exemptions. (Para 8) |
| 4. personal information is protected unless public interest justifies disclosure. (Para 9) |
| 5. final ruling on the appeal. (Para 10) |
Hon’ble Commissioner _ANANDI RAMALINGAM O R D E R
1. The Appellant filed an RTI application dated 23.12.2023 seeking information on the following points:
“I am Anitya Prasad Das, a citizen of India. Under the Right to Information Act 2005, Section 6 read with, Sections 2(f) 2(i) and 2(j), I need some information. This information as sought under is very critical and urgently needed by me since it involves my life and liberty and thus may be provided expeditiously under section 7(1) of the RTI Act 2005. The details of the information sought are as follows a) Bank Account Statement for past six months i.e. from 1st Jun 2023 to 20th Dec
2023 the SBI Saving Account No. *******4917 (IFSC Code: SBIN0005680), Tollygunge Branch, New Theatre, Kolkata) held by Ms. Sagarika Mohanty.
b) The above account number belongs to es
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
