Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA, J
GOVIND RAM – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF NCT OF DELHI – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. entry of the applicant into court under bail conditions. (Para 2) |
| 2. arguments for bail based on personal circumstances and procedural deficiencies. (Para 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 3. court evaluates risks of flight and witness tampering. (Para 9) |
| 4. arguments against bail focusing on seriousness of charges and presumptions. (Para 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 5. consideration of constitutional rights in the context of bail. (Para 14 , 19) |
| 6. opposition from the complainant highlights severity of charges. (Para 20) |
| 7. court grants bail based on lack of evidence and delays in trial. (Para 23) |
| 8. final decision granting bail with conditions. (Para 24 , 25) |
2. The Applicant has submitted that he is 64 years old, resident of Mehrauli, New Delhi. He has been working as a driver for more than 20 years and has no criminal antecedents. He was apprehended on 10.07.2023 for the offence under Section of POCSO Act and is in custody since then.
3. The brief facts are that a Complaint was lodged by the Complainant Smt. H that on 09.07.2023 at about 07:00 P.M while she was coming back home from her office, she saw the Applicant with the victim H. Both of them had allegedly pulled down their respective pants and kn
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
