SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1996 Supreme(Online)(Del) 11

DELHI HIGH COURT
Y. K. Sabharwal, K. Shivashankar Bhat, D. K. Jain, JJ
Gupta J. P. v. D. D. A.


Advocates:
For the Appellant: Unknown
For the Respondent: Unknown

Table of Content
1. dispute over flat pricing and allegations of discrimination. (Para 1 , 2)
2. dda defends pricing methods and legal basis. (Para 3 , 10)
3. judicial review limits in pricing disputes. (Para 11 , 12)
4. final ruling on petition dismissal. (Para 14)

1The petitioner, in the present writ petition, filed by him under Art.226 of the Consfitution of India, assails the demand - cum - allotment letter dated the 27th / 31st May, 1991 (Annexure C - 1), issued by the Delhi Development Authority (hereinafter referred to as 'the DDA'), in his favour allotting III category flat, situated to Sarita Vihar, Delhi to him.

2. The facts relevant for the disposal of the present writ petition lie in a narrow compass. The petitioner got himself registered for the allotment of a flat under the "Fifth Self Financing Housing Registration Scheme, 1982", floated by D. D. A. on 14-8-1982. Thereafter, in pursuance of a call in the daily news papers to apply for flats, which had been constructed by the respondent DDA, the petitioner on 4-3-1991 applied to the respondent D.D.A. for allotment of a flat in Sarita Vihar. The petitioner received letter dated 27/31-5-1991 (Annexure C - 1) from the DDA inti
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top