Back
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI
R. K. Agrawal (President)
Sri M. Govinda Reddy and M. Yashodamma – Appellant
Versus
M/s. Venkat Estates Pvt. Ltd. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. complaint raises consumer status of landowners. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. response asserts a commercial nature requiring dismissal. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. the court assesses adequacy of service versus consumer classification. (Para 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 4. deliberation on jurisdiction under consumer laws. (Para 8 , 10) |
| 5. final ruling affirms consumer status enabling forum review. (Para 9 , 11 , 12) |
1. The present Appeal has been filed against the Order dated 24/06/2022 passed by the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Karnataka (hereinafter referred to as State Commission), whereby the Complaint filed by the Complainants was dismissed with cost to Rs.50,000 to be paidin Consumer Welfare Fund of the State Commission.
2. Brief facts of the case are that Appellants / Complainants Sri M. Govinda Reddy and M. Yashodamma, are the absolute owners of the Property of bearing Sy. No. 101 of Kittaganur Village, Bidarahalli Hobli, Bangalore measuring 4 acres (hereinafter referred to as the land). Respondent No. 1, M/s. Venkat Estates Pvt. Ltd., approached them to develop multi - story residential apartments with all amenities in 2 acres out of the total 4 acres of Land. A Joint Development Agreeme
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
