Back
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI
Subhash Chandra (Presiding Member)
Urban Improvement Trust v. Magha Ram
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner contests dismissal of consumer complaint. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. details of the auction process and subsequent events. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. district forum's order on complaint upheld by state commission. (Para 5 , 6) |
| 4. arguments on jurisdiction and consumer status in auction. (Para 7 , 8 , 9) |
| 5. issues of delay and service obligations highlighted. (Para 10 , 11) |
| 6. court observations on jurisdiction and consumer definition. (Para 12 , 13 , 14) |
| 7. final conclusions and ruling to allow the revision petition. (Para 15 , 16) |
1. This revision petition under S.19 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (in short, the ˜Act') assails the order dated 2.2.2017 in First Appeal No. 238 of 2013 of the State Consumer Disputes Redressal, Delhi (in short, the ˜State Commission') which dismissed the appeal against order dated 30.7.2007 of the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, New Delhi (in short, the ˜District Forum') in Consumer Complaint No. 254/2005 that had allowed the complaint filed by the respondent.
2. I have heard the learned Counsel for both the parties and perused the material on record carefully.
3. According to the petitioner the facts of the case are that it publish
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
